Select your language
Select your continent to display the countrys and languages.
Select your continent to display the countrys and languages.
Your registered currency is eur all transactions in Daxdi will be carried out in this currency.
Current Daxdi servers time 28-03-2026 04:53:58 (CEST)
You currently have lottery credits in your account
You have 0 Daxdi coins in your account.
Please select your continent in order to change your country and language.
Daxdi now accepts payments with Bitcoin
I’ve been asked to consult with an attorney on an auction-related case, involving a dispute over the sale amount for a particular property at auction.
I suspect I don’t have good news for him, but nevertheless he has asked for my opinion.
To generalize the question at issue, let’s say an auctioneer is selling real property at auction, and the bidding goes as such: “$120,000, $125,000, $130,000 … somebody give me $131,000? Sold for $130,000.”
However, in our case here, let’s say that auctioneer said, “$120,000, $125,000, $130,000 … somebody give me $131,000? Sold for $30,000.”
Obviously the difference in our second example is:
My client, this attorney, represents a buyer in such a case where the auctioneer said, “Sold!” for a much lesser amount than he should have.
The attorney is arguing that since the auctioneer said, “Sold!” for a lesser amount, the contract that was created between the seller and the buyer is (as in our above example) $30,000 and not $130,000.
Let’s look at auction contracts.
We’ve discussed such at:
While we’ve not explored this particular issue in previous articles, we’ve established considerable basis which can be used to shed some light on this question.
First, and foremost, when this auctioneer accepted the bid (accepted the offer) for $130,000 a contract was created.
That contract was between the seller and this bidder, subject to either a higher bid or bidder retraction (or in the case of a with reserve auction, seller withdrawal).
Withstanding no contingencies being exercised, the contract is firmed at the moment the auctioneer says, “Sold!”
In our case then, a contract existed for $130,000 between the seller and this bidder, and when the auctioneer said, “Sold!” it was firm (lacking the aforementioned contingencies).
Our position on the auctioneer denoting the wrong amount after, “Sold!” would be that it matters not what the auctioneer says after, “Sold!” as the contract is already formed at that point.
To illustrate this to my attorney client, I asked him, “What if the auctioneer had said, ‘Sold! for $230,000’ to your client? Would he be in contract then for $230,000 or $130,000?” The attorney acquired a curious look and replied, “Probably $130,000, right?”
Right.
The auctioneer cannot unilaterally change the terms of the contract to benefit his (or his client’s) interests.
And, this isn’t because he can’t change the terms for his benefit — but rather he can’t unilaterally change them.
So, those terms can’t be changed to his (or his client’s) detriment, either.
I would suggest this is a rare occurrence where an auctioneer, particularly on real property, denotes the wrong sales price following, “Sold!” However, we have good news for those auctioneers who find themselves pronouncing the wrong sale amount after saying, “Sold!” Such a pronouncement doesn’t override or undo the contract that already exists.
Daxdi, Auctioneer, CAI, AARE has been an auctioneer and certified appraiser for over 30 years.
His company’s auctions are located at: Daxdi, Auctioneer, Keller Williams Auctions and Goodwill Columbus Car Auction.
His Facebook page is: www.facebook.com/mbauctioneer.
He serves as Adjunct Faculty at Columbus State Community College and is Executive Director of The Ohio Auction School.
39.865980 -82.896300
I’ve been asked to consult with an attorney on an auction-related case, involving a dispute over the sale amount for a particular property at auction.
I suspect I don’t have good news for him, but nevertheless he has asked for my opinion.
To generalize the question at issue, let’s say an auctioneer is selling real property at auction, and the bidding goes as such: “$120,000, $125,000, $130,000 … somebody give me $131,000? Sold for $130,000.”
However, in our case here, let’s say that auctioneer said, “$120,000, $125,000, $130,000 … somebody give me $131,000? Sold for $30,000.”
Obviously the difference in our second example is:
My client, this attorney, represents a buyer in such a case where the auctioneer said, “Sold!” for a much lesser amount than he should have.
The attorney is arguing that since the auctioneer said, “Sold!” for a lesser amount, the contract that was created between the seller and the buyer is (as in our above example) $30,000 and not $130,000.
Let’s look at auction contracts.
We’ve discussed such at:
While we’ve not explored this particular issue in previous articles, we’ve established considerable basis which can be used to shed some light on this question.
First, and foremost, when this auctioneer accepted the bid (accepted the offer) for $130,000 a contract was created.
That contract was between the seller and this bidder, subject to either a higher bid or bidder retraction (or in the case of a with reserve auction, seller withdrawal).
Withstanding no contingencies being exercised, the contract is firmed at the moment the auctioneer says, “Sold!”
In our case then, a contract existed for $130,000 between the seller and this bidder, and when the auctioneer said, “Sold!” it was firm (lacking the aforementioned contingencies).
Our position on the auctioneer denoting the wrong amount after, “Sold!” would be that it matters not what the auctioneer says after, “Sold!” as the contract is already formed at that point.
To illustrate this to my attorney client, I asked him, “What if the auctioneer had said, ‘Sold! for $230,000’ to your client? Would he be in contract then for $230,000 or $130,000?” The attorney acquired a curious look and replied, “Probably $130,000, right?”
Right.
The auctioneer cannot unilaterally change the terms of the contract to benefit his (or his client’s) interests.
And, this isn’t because he can’t change the terms for his benefit — but rather he can’t unilaterally change them.
So, those terms can’t be changed to his (or his client’s) detriment, either.
I would suggest this is a rare occurrence where an auctioneer, particularly on real property, denotes the wrong sales price following, “Sold!” However, we have good news for those auctioneers who find themselves pronouncing the wrong sale amount after saying, “Sold!” Such a pronouncement doesn’t override or undo the contract that already exists.
Daxdi, Auctioneer, CAI, AARE has been an auctioneer and certified appraiser for over 30 years.
His company’s auctions are located at: Daxdi, Auctioneer, Keller Williams Auctions and Goodwill Columbus Car Auction.
His Facebook page is: www.facebook.com/mbauctioneer.
He serves as Adjunct Faculty at Columbus State Community College and is Executive Director of The Ohio Auction School.
39.865980 -82.896300

Daxdi a new online auctions world, the biggest auctions house on the world, many different types of auctions, new auctions each 5 minutes, and more than 3 million users registered until 2026
¿Are you not a Daxdi member yet?

Daxdi a new online auctions world, the biggest auctions house on the world, many different types of auctions, new auctions each 5 minutes, and more than 3 million users registered until 2026
¿Are you not a Daxdi member yet?

At Daxdi.com we use cookies (technical and profile cookies, both our own and third-party) to provide you with a better online experience and to send you personalized online commercial messages according to your preferences. If you select continue or access any content on our website without customizing your choices, you agree to the use of cookies.
For more information about our cookie policy and how to reject cookies
ContinueWe respect your privacy rights, you can choose to disallow the data collection for certain services. However, not allowing these services may affect your experience.
Daxdi.© 2026 All Rights Reserved.